Archive for November, 2009


Copyright: What is it?

Posted by admin on 30th, 2009

Copyright: What is it?

By: Julian Boote

Artists, writers, innovators, and entrepreneurs…in fact creative and business people from all backgrounds; mostly those starting out, but even some with a level of experience in their field behind them, have at some point or another realized they’ve had misconceptions about what copyright is, how it works, for what types of creative work, and what it can do for them.

So, let’s get started, and perhaps with the most obvious questions anyone may have about copyright; what is it, and why does it exist in the first place?

Let’s start with the latter question first.

Why copyright exists

Imagine this scenario; you build a cottage, say, to your own design. It’s a beautiful, Tudor-style, thatched roof affair, with a small, well-kept garden, and a breath-taking view of rolling, verdant green hills offering spectacular sunsets in the evening. Now imagine someone finds out about your unique, very attractive cottage one day, and moves in while you’re out. You come home to suddenly find you can’t get back in, and this squatter inside is claiming they own your house, that they built it even, and worse, they’ve started renting out the back bedroom for a pretty penny. To cap it all, they’re now building duplicate cottages matching your design down the road to sell and earn even more money. Now imagine there was no law in existence to give you the opportunity to re-claim ownership of your property and no means to stop the usurper or win restitution from them for their actions.

Transfer this - admittedly crude - analogy to creativity, and that’s why copyright exists.

I like how the Irish Patents Office(1) puts it on their website with regards the Nature of Copyright:

“First, persons who create works of the intellect or who invest in their creation and dissemination are entitled as a matter of human right to secure a fair return for their creativity and investment.

Secondly, unless the rights of creators and investors to a fair return are supported, the community as a whole would be impoverished by the fact that, in many cases, these works would not be created or developed.”(2)

Our civilization progresses through creativity and innovation. But for creators to create, they need to eat, they need to live, earn money, receive recognition for their work and the stimulus to keep striving when the going gets tough. Copyright exists therefore to make this happen and help the innovators earn revenue from their creations. Copyright exists to promote creativity and help creative people live from their creativity. Copyright exists because it makes creative and business sense for copyright to exist.

If a writer earns money from their work, they can earn the funds to keep writing. If an artist earns money from the licensing and manufacturing of images of artwork, they have income so they can invest their time productively in more projects. Furthermore, copyright exists to encourage innovation and prosperity, for society as a whole as well as for the individual doing the innovating.

Take copyright away and you effectively tie the hands behind creatives’ backs. Imagine a world culturally, creatively, industrially and economically deprived because its innovators weren’t given the reward for - and the power to protect the use of - their endeavours.

With that in mind, lets put my cottage analogy into proper context now; you’re a creative person, aren’t you? Imagine every time you created something, someone could come along and copy it, claim it as their own and very likely make money from it, and without fear of consequences because there was no law making their actions punishable. You’d very soon give up creating wouldn’t you? What’d be the point of all that hard work when others could reap the credit and the reward?

Fortunately for us, that’s not how it is in the real world. Lets read again what the Irish Patents Office says; that it’s a “…human right to secure a fair return for their creativity and investment.” I say again, nicely put.

So that’s why copyright exists.

But just what is copyright?

Copyright is…

If you consider my crude cottage analogy again; it essentially establishes what copyright is… a property right. But a property right that applies, not to land or buildings or vehicles, but to products of the human mind… of our intellect. Creative products, such as literary, dramatic, musical or artistic or filmic work.

And what can one do with this “intellectual property” right?

Well, copyright has some similar but also different entitlements to other forms of property right, specifically allowing the copyright owner (or owners) to:

* copy, lend and distribute their work

* license others (i.e. grant written permission) to use the copyright owner’s work

* adapt their work or licence others to do so (e.g. adapt a book into a movie)

* sell their created work - their intellectual property - to others, and, importantly…

* have powers to stop wrongful infringement of those rights by third parties, i.e. the copying and exploitation of the copyright owner’s work without their permission, as well as…

* obtain recompense in the form of compensation or damages for infringement where loss of revenue has been discovered.

This applies to a copyright owners work, whether or not it’s been published, exhibited or otherwise released to the public for their consumption.

Not only this though…

Moral Rights in copyright

A creator and commissioner of a copyrighted work is also entitled under copyright to other rights relating to their work. Called “Moral Rights”, these are:

* the right to be identified as the author (or artist, or photographer, or composer, or director etc.), and to stop a work being falsely attributed to them

* the right not to have their work subjected to derogatory treatment (alteration, re-arrangement or deletion) by others; “derogatory treatment” being where the resulting work is mutilated, distorted, and can damage the creator/authors reputation

* the right to privacy when it comes to certain photographs and films (e.g. a commissioner of private photos has the right not to have them published or exhibited to the public where the photos become copyright works)

Here’s some examples of these above three points:

I’ve asserted my moral right to be identified as the author of this article; a right I have under law to do so(3). Were this a fictional book, and it was adapted into a movie, I’d also have the right to be identified in the movie as the author of the source novel - unless you set aside the right. Conversely, Alan Moore, whose now legendary unhappiness at the treatment of adaptations of his graphic novels and how he feels they’ve reflected badly on his original work, has prompted him to demand his name be removed from the movies credits, such as Watchmen.

If for some reason, J K Rowlings Harry Potter series of books had been knowingly and deliberately credited as my work and not hers by someone else, both she and I could stop it, due to false attribution.(4)

If during the editing of this book, I’d felt a third party (an editor, a publisher or printer) had done a hatchet job on all my hard work, I could not only let it be known how unhappy I was with this mistreatment, but I’d have the right to stop it too.(5)

Finally, the photo-portraits of my significant other and I which we paid a professional photographer for, hang on the walls where we live… and nowhere else without our say-so.(6)

See how Moral Rights work?

Now I need to mention there are however exceptions to Moral Rights; they can’t be asserted when copyrighted works are computer programs or computer-generated work (created without human intervention), or for a typeface design. Also, if the creator/author hasn’t asserted their right to be identified as the creator/author if that right applies, the Moral Right hasn’t been violated. In addition, if the creator/author works for an employer who does/will own the copyright of the work you produce, you will not have this right either (more on this “Work Made For Hire” later).

Who owns copyright

Now that we know the “what” and “why” of copyright, lets find out the “who”; just who this “copyright owner” I’ve mentioned is:

The copyright owner is the person or persons who created the work that is copyrighted.

You might well have guessed that already.

Under copyright law then, creatives are usually the first person(s) granted ownership of copyright over the work they’ve created, as outlined above.(7) So if you’re someone who’s created a copyrighted work, the rights of ownership to that copyrighted work belong to none other… than you.

Lets be clear about this; no-one else but you, the creator of the copyrighted work, has these rights; not your mum, your partner, not nice Mrs Miggins down the road. (Yes, not even her either.) They’re yours and yours alone (unless the created work has been a collaborative effort).(8) Exclusively. Nor will those rights be anyone else’s unless and until you as the rights owner (sometimes called “rights holder” too) grants permission of usage - licenses - or gives away/sells - assigns - those rights.

Sounds good doesn’t it? Works for me.

Having said that though…

There’s ownership and then there’s Ownership

People can get the wrong end of the stick when they hear about copyright ownership, so I thought - now that’d I’ve identified what copyright ownership is - it’d be worth clarifying what it isn’t.

Now where you live you have products like DVDs, books and CDs all over, and you own them, right? I mean you paid good money for them, right? Sure you did. So you’re their owner.

But does that mean you own the copyright subsisting in those products?

No, of course you don’t.

Its the author and/or the publisher/distributor who retains the copyright. There’s a difference then to owning a copy of a copyrightable work, and owning the copyright of that work itself. If you’re forking out cash for, say a CD, you’re buying ownership of that CD copy of that recording artists album, not ownership of the master recordings themselves, nor the right to produce copies of the CD you purchased either.

If more than one author or creator has been involved in producing the work, then joint copyright ownership applies. Song writing partnerships are a classic example, wherein by virtue of having co-written a song, they each become the joint copyright owners.

Then there’s being hired to produce some work.

Were you hired? Check your copyright

We have all been employees, and many of us have been hired as freelancers. And in that time I guarantee you, we put something together, wrote or drew something for our employer. Does this mean according to what I’ve outlined above that copyright became ours?

Not necessarily.

You see, if we prepared this work as part of the duties of our employment, or if it was commissioned from us, if we’re part of team employed on a project, or if in fact, we’re building something under a “work made for hire” agreement, then in all likelihood the copyright will be our employers, not ours.

So are you in employment right now and creating works the rights to which you assumed were yours? Then take a look at the employment contract you signed with your employer. There are likely to be provisions in there which cover this question of ownership. Or are you yourself commissioning work from others? Then look at the purchase orders you send out or agreements you sign. Are there clauses in the terms and conditions which cover intellectual property rights for people you hire, so that those rights are yours upon payment?

So there we are; that’s what copyright is, its purpose, and who gets to use it.

To learn more about copyright, please see our resource box.

References:

(1) Irish Patents Office - “Copyright - A brief history”

(2) Irish Patents Office - “Copyright - A brief history”

(3) The Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 1988, Chapter IV Moral Rights, sections 77-79.

(4) The Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 1988, Chapter IV Moral Rights, section 84

(5) The Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 1988, Chapter IV Moral Rights, sections 80-81

(6) The Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 1988, Chapter IV Moral Rights, section 85

(7) The Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 1988, Chapter I, Subsistence, Ownership and Duration of Copyright, section 11.

(8) If more than one author or creator has been involved in producing the work, then joint copyright ownership applies. Song writing partnerships are a classic example, wherein by virtue of having co-written a song, they each become the joint copyright owners.

Article Source:
http://www.articlecity.com/articles/music_and_movies/article_1124.shtml


“Yes”, The Pet Shop Boys Are Back

Posted by admin on 29th, 2009

\”Yes\”, The Pet Shop Boys Are Back

By: Patrick Daniels

With more then 50 million worldwide record sales since 1986, Neil Tennant and Chris Lowe have carried their English, electronic dance music duo through over two decades of success. This success continues to their latest album, Yes, which has everything fans have grown to love. It is filled with innovative artistry and has an excellent commercial appeal that makes “Yes” full of potential hits. Chris Lowe also returns in this album, which is something that the PSB have been missing.

Whether you are a long time fan of the PSB or this is the first album you have decided to try, you will be able to notice the large amount of insight into the music industry that this duo posses. With tracks like cool dance “Love Etc” directed to the socialite crowd, to the ballad “Beautiful People” there is something for all types of music lovers.

In the usual PSB tone that you would expect are the sneaky hidden undertones and covert social comments that the fans expect. The great thing about the Pet Shop Boys is there way of conveying their messages in such a way as to be equally as pleasing to both liberal and conservative listeners. Like in Building a Wall where it refers to not so much to keep you out/more to keep me in this could convey a message of immigration or one of intimacy or can just make for nice listening for those who aren’t looking for anything more.

“Pandemonium” is one of my favorite tracks on the album. It is an incredible mix of disco that has a primal feel and takes you back to the head banger days.

“Yes” has everything you would expect from a Pet Shop Boy CD. It is danceable, everyday pop with a combination of warmth and irony making “Yes” a must have for ant PSB fan, or fans of pop music.

Article Source:
http://www.articlecity.com/articles/music_and_movies/article_1114.shtml


Playing the flute is easy with Flute Lessons Singapore.

Posted by admin on 28th, 2009

Playing the flute is easy with Flute Lessons Singapore.

By: Jess Tan

Tips for Selecting a Flute Teacher

Finding a flute teacher in Singapore can be a bit daunting, but by creating your own profile and having an idea of what qualities you desire in a flute teacher in Singapore, it can be an adventure to research and choose a new teacher! Seek flute teacher candidate names from your colleagues in your ensembles, your musical neighbors and relatives, your local colleges and universities, music stores and even the internet and yellow pages.

Before beginning your search or making that first phone call (Refer to the Flute Student Defining Quiz below for assistance with these issues):

1. Define your flute goals (get a higher chair; win competitions; audition prep; sheer enjoyment; to do your part toward world peace; etc.)

2. Determine your commitment level for practicing the flute.

3. Be realistic about “time” allotment for daily/weekly practice

4. Ascertain your current playing level (advanced, intermediate, upper beginner, etc.)

5. Gather your music (for the past year or so) and have it on hand

6. Make the call yourself if you are age 15 and up. Your parents may handle the business end, but you need to navigate and field the music related inquires

Here are some sources for finding a local flute teacher in SIngapore

• Contact your local music school or music academy.

• Inquire at local musical equipment stores.

• Contact your local symphony for referrals.

• Contact local religious organizations.

• Advertisements (any of the above locations may have ads posted).

Now that you know where to find an flute teacher in Singapore, how can you make sure he/she is the best for your needs?

• Ask for references from student currently receiving instruction.

• Does the flute teacher put their students in competitions e.g. all-County, All district, All-State etc. If so, how well do their students perform in competitions?

• Does the flute teacher in Singapore know about musical opportunities for students in the community e.g. community bands or orchestras?

• Will they ensure there are opportunities for their students to perform in recitals or in public?

I would consider it important to receive positive answers to each of the questions above. I would consider the answers to the following questions when comparing different flute instructor’s in Singapore rates:

• What type of professional experience does the Singaporean flute teacher have?

• How long have they been teaching flute?

• Where did this instructor go to school for flute?

• Is the flute the teacher’s primary instrument?

A student that thrives in a very structured learning environment may do better with an instructor that provides the same lesson plans and practice assignments to all their students. Yet some flute teachers in Singapore look to spark a passion for the flute by catering their instruction around the musical interests of their students. Try to match the student’s learning style with an instructor’s teaching style.

Also, some flute teachers in Singapore tend to teach their students by the Suzuki method. In general, the Suzuki method is described as learning music by ear instead of learning to read and play by musical notation. Beginners may quickly learn to play musical compositions by hearing it using this method. However, one criticism of this style is that many students of the Suzuki style may develop a weakness in their ability to read music. Therefore, if your student learns by this style, I recommend they also learn to read sheet music at some point if they wish to pursue flute performance as a profession.

Playing the flute can be easy with proper guidance. Build a strong foundation with our professional flute teachers. Flute Lessons Singapore, sharing the love for flute in Singapore. http://www.flutelessonssingapore.com

Article Source:
http://www.articlecity.com/articles/music_and_movies/article_1118.shtml


[MV] Super Junior M - U

Posted by admin on 28th, 2009


Hankyung, Siwon, Donghae, Kyuhyun, Ryeowook, Henry, Zhoumi in Super Junior M release their first MV, the Chinese version of U. — It’s kind of ridiculous how hot I find everyone. My first reaction was completely capslocked and incoherent. Now, I can say: Hankyung = 10x hotter than normal and OH THOSE HIPS Siwon = Please sex up mirrors more often Donghae = HE RAPS. IN CHINESE. AND DOES IT WELL. I’m so impressed, Fishie. I love him so much. Kyuhyun = He’s younger than me. Stop being so …


Super Junior M - Super Girl MV teaser

Posted by admin on 28th, 2009


They’re BACK, Super Junior M after over a year of hiatus are back with their first Mini album “Super Girl”. Support our lucky 7 and don’t forget to check out Third Chapter, the only international source just for SJ-M! thirdchapter.org BUY THE ALBUM!!! - Thanks SM Ent.


U LIVE - Super Junior M

Posted by admin on 28th, 2009


Chinese sub-unit. With Siwon, Hankyung, Donghae, Ryeowook, Kyuhyun, Henry and Zhou Mi of Super Junior!


[HQ/MV] Super Junior-M - Super Girl

Posted by admin on 28th, 2009


After much anticipation, the MV is out! We’ll have to do with HQ till HD is out (hopefully). No bashing allowed!


Super junior-M M (迷) MV 中文版 (chinese subtitle)

Posted by admin on 28th, 2009


Super junior-M M (迷) MV 中文版(chinese subtitle) 國語中文大碟第2首主打MV 1.迷(ME) 源: 奔跑迎著風浪舞蹈把煩惱脫掉只想要抓住這一刻這一秒賢: 空氣裡充滿歡笑青春的味道是一種絢麗的顏料世界不再只有單調的記號庚: 不曾有過動搖不停的建造OH ~夢想的城堡海: 我會默默地祈禱再一次看到你微笑合:It’s gonna be 迷(me) 源:拋開煩惱去奔跑合:It’s gonna be 迷(me) 海:聆聽我真實的心跳周:把你擁入我懷抱還有什麼更重要H:像童話故事一樣的美好合:It’s gonna be 迷(me) 庚:想要把你緊緊抓牢合:It’s gonna be 迷(me) 旭


[Eng-Sub]Super Junior M - 到了明天 (Blue Tomorrow)

Posted by admin on 28th, 2009


One word about the lyrics: Literature. I seldom come across lyrics as poetic as this (or maybe its just my lack of interest/ exposure in chinese songs). The lyrics is sad and the melody just makes people depress. LOL. AND KYU IS GORGEOUS. His pronounciation has really improved for this album! What I do not like about the MV is, SM clearly isn’t putting in money on their stars at all. ITS SUCH A LOW-BUDGET MV, All I need is a black and white background, and some fire and voila. -.- Anyway …


Super Junior M_台北首次FAN PARTY_預告

Posted by admin on 28th, 2009


亞洲最夯天團Super Junior子團Super JuniorM(簡稱SJ-M),憑藉著首張國語迷你專輯『SUPER GIRL』以兩天的銷售成績拿下台灣兩大銷售排行榜G-Music與五大唱片行的”華語榜冠軍”後,對台灣心存感激的SJ-M也於昨日在眾歌迷朋友的眼前,親口宣佈即將於12/5(六)、12/6(日)在”台北國際會議中心”一連舉行兩場名為「台北首次FAN PARTY」的歌迷會,而這詢問度超高的兩場歌迷會也已確定將在11/14(六)中午12點透過年代售票系統於全台正式開賣!團員”厲旭”則靦腆地說:「12/5、6我們要在台灣辦歌友會了,而12/6剛好是我父母的結婚紀念日,但我要在